🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOff-TopicRoad trip snack guide — high protein, GLP-1 friendly Page 2

Road trip snack guide — high protein, GLP-1 friendly

TomFromTexas Wed, May 27, 2026 at 5:35 AM 7 replies 415 viewsPage 2 of 2
jason_paloalto
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Palo Alto, CA
May 27, 2026 at 7:36 AM#6
TomFromTexas said:
The RDA is the wrong reference and it is worth understanding why.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass278 lbs233 lbs195 lbs
Fat mass98 lbs78 lbs45 lbs
Lean mass151 lbs153 lbs152 lbs
Body fat %39%33%24%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.4g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

49 19tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sarah_nash92
Member
712
3,123
Jun 2024
Nashville, TN
May 27, 2026 at 8:23 AM#7

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

How people are hitting a protein target on a genuinely suppressed appetite, because volume is the binding constraint rather than willingness?

48 18JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jim_asheville
Member
289
1,234
Aug 2024
Asheville, NC
May 27, 2026 at 9:10 AM#8
jason_paloalto said:
DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake: Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.

47 17NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
TomFromTexas
Member
645
2,890
May 2024
Austin, TX
May 27, 2026 at 9:57 AM#9

Closing the loop on my own question.

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

46 16PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
andrew_nyc
Member
534
2,345
Apr 2024
New York, NY
May 27, 2026 at 1:44 PM#10
jim_asheville said:
Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers. Using current weight at the start of a large loss produces a target that is both unachievable and unnecessary.

28 1JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

What are you cooking tonight? (High protein edition)9 replies
Fitness tracker recommendations — beyond step counting10 replies
Books that changed your relationship with food17 replies
Air fryer recipes thread — quick high-protein meals23 replies
What does your shot day routine look like?6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register