DeniseRN_TPA said:

Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.

dave_SLC said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

dave_SLC said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

dave_SLC said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.