Dr.PeteFamMed said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.

Dr.PeteFamMed said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

Dr.PeteFamMed said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

carl_compliance said:

Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Posting only so the count is not one.