Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Mine went the same way, slower.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Coming at Dr.LeslieOBGYN’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after Dr.LeslieOBGYN’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Dr.AddMedPHL said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Pushing back on Dr.AddMedPHL here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.