Dr.AddMedPHL said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

I read this differently from Dr.AddMedPHL, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

Dr.AddMedPHL said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

Dr.AddMedPHL said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread. Writing that down for the next person who wants the interesting answer.