🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareSELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction Page 3

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction

Dr.CardioMD Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:48 AM 16 replies 240 viewsPage 3 of 4
mia_MS2
New Member
8
23
Jun 2026
Ann Arbor, MI
Jun 8, 2026 at 6:57 PM#11
VendorMark said:
Read four things before the headline number.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

44 19ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NephBHM_UK
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Birmingham, UK
Jun 8, 2026 at 7:24 PM#12

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of GLP-1 agonists and cardiovascular risk: beyond weight loss, GLP-1R activation directly suppresses NF-κB signaling, reduces NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and decreases monocyte/macrophage adhesion to endothelium[1].

Clinical correlates: hsCRP reduction of 30-60% (consistently seen across trials), reduced carotid intima-media thickness, and decreased coronary plaque inflammation on PET imaging.

These anti-inflammatory effects likely contribute to the cardiovascular benefit seen in SELECT — and may explain benefits beyond what weight loss alone would predict.

References:
[1] Hogan AE, et al. Diabetologia. 2014;57(4):781-784.
43 18EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Jun 8, 2026 at 7:51 PM#13
sarah_TO said:
Relative and absolute effects need reading together.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I would add the less popular caveat: these trial populations under-represented several groups, older adults and the highest BMI categories among them. The results probably generalise, and "probably" should be stated as an assumption rather than dropped.

42 17TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Jun 8, 2026 at 8:18 PM#14
Dr.CardioMD said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

I'm 67 years old and want to share my perspective on cardiovascular risk as an older member of this community.

My doctor was initially hesitant because of my age, but the SELECT trial included patients up to 72 and showed consistent benefit across age groups. We started at the lowest dose with closer monitoring.

17 months later: down 64 lbs, off atorvastatin, A1C from 8.8% to 5.5%. My cardiologist is thrilled. cardiovascular risk is absolutely relevant for older adults — don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

41 16BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros, KetoKyle and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jun 8, 2026 at 8:46 PM#15

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

40 15PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
What I wish I knew before starting GLP-1 therapy14 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register