sean_dublin said:

Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

sean_dublin said:

Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.

Following on from sean_dublin — and this may be the naive question:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

wendy_avl said:

One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.

I read this differently from wendy_avl, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.