rachel_ABQ said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
rachel_ABQ said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
pete_nash said:Iron studies on micronutrients — important especially for women: Marker Baseline Month 6 After Supplementation Ferritin 78 26 58 Iron 108 63 96 TIBC…
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Taking it to my next appointment.
rachel_ABQ said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.