🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersKidney function on semaglutide — my results so far Page 5

Kidney function on semaglutide — my results so far

CanadaChris Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 2:35 AM 34 replies 1,630 viewsPage 5 of 7
tyler_CSCS
Member
567
2,567
Jun 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Dec 16, 2025 at 5:44 PM#21
VendorMark said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.

41 14sean_dublin, hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
zoe_NC
Member
278
1,234
Nov 2024
Charlotte, NC
Dec 28, 2025 at 2:10 AM#22
VendorMark said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.

42 15FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
AttorneyGrant
Member
567
2,890
Apr 2024
Washington, DC
Jan 8, 2026 at 10:29 AM#23
VendorMark said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

43 16JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Jan 19, 2026 at 6:42 PM#24

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

Last edited: Jan 19, 2026 at 9:42 PM
44 17lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeNYC_runner
Member
378
1,678
Jul 2024
New York, NY
Jan 31, 2026 at 2:48 AM#25
lisa_labSD said:
The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.

45 18MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register