A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Reporting back.
Water and magnesium first, soluble fiber second, and dropping the bran entirely. Resolved in about a week after two months of getting it backwards.
wendy_avl said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultswendy_avl said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
That reframing is the part I needed.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.