Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

anna.melb_AU said:

It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

anna.melb_AU said:

It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.

One thing that is still open after anna.melb_AU’s answer:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?